LinkLoomAI Editorial

Twitter @Artificial Analysis

X·KOL研究与评测昨天 02:24精选

76

Score

Re Flare pairs its quality gains with a much shorter wait for images and edits, with GPT Image 2.5 Flare (max) having a ~63% faster latency than GPT I...

AI 摘要

模型生成,可能有偏差;请以原文为准

评测机构 Artificial Analysis 发布针对 GPT Image 2.5 Flare 的独立推理速度基准测试结果。在 1024×1024 分辨率测试中,Flare (max) 中位数生成时间从 142.9 秒降至 52.7 秒,延迟减少约 63%,Sunburst (max) 生成时间减少 24% 至 108.9 秒。该测试验证了 OpenAI 关于 Flare 相比 GPT Image 2 降低 50% 延迟的官方声明,为图像生成落地提供了第三方性能基准。

正文

Re Flare pairs its quality gains with a much shorter wait for images and edits, with GPT Image 2.5 Flare (max) having a ~63% faster latency than GPT Image 2 (high)

In our independent inference speed benchmarking, our preliminary results show similar improvements to OpenAI's claim of 50% lower latency for Flare versus GPT Image 2:

➤ Flare (max) reduced median generation time by 63%, from 142.9 to 52.7 seconds

➤ Sunburst (max) reduced median generation time by 24% to 108.9s

Our testing used 1024 × 1024 PNG outputs and represents a median across several testing runs including inference and image transfer.
评测·基准图像生成OpenAI
Re Flare pairs its quality gains with a much shorter wait for images and edits, with GPT Image 2.5 Flare (max) having a ~63% faster latency than GPT I... · LinkLoom